|
The History of Taṣawwuf and ‘Irfān
By: Reza Beranjkar Different Periods of Taṣawwuf: #7778;ūfī music)40. Some scholars believe that many of the teachings of neo-Platonic philosophers entered in the Islamic mysticism and ‘Irfān through Zunnūn 41. One of the characteristics of this period is that the mystical issues were expressed in symbolic language. Zunnūn Miṣrī was the person who employed the symbolic language42; though the symbolic and metaphorical language was used by the Ṣūfīs from the very beginning43. Bāyazīd Busṭāmī was the most famous Ṣūfī of third century AH. He was from Busṭām in Khurāsān. He passed a large part of his age in that region. According to Winfield44, Bāyazīd had the greatest influence in the formation of Islamic mystical thoughts45. Nicholson says Bāyazīd was the first who used the term fanā in an exact and precise mystical sense of annihilation of human soul unto the Eternal Being through a process of Love. He may be considered the person who founded the School of fanā46. The sayings of Bāyazīd, that has been narrated, show he believed in Unity of Being and in fanā fillāh (annihilation of mortal being in God) . Some of his sentences are as follows: “ I am God, there is no God, except me, so worship me47 praise to me how great is my shān (grandeur)48. Such apparent blasphemous utterances need explanation and can be interpreted only in the mystic concept of waḥdat al wujūd.. During this period two different methods and schools became prevalent among the Ṣūfīs, one was called the method of ṣaḥw and the other was called the method of Sukr. Qushairī defined two terms in the following manner: ṣaḥw is alertness and return from the ‘state’ of bīkhabarī (intoxication) while sukr is the state of intoxication i(bīkhabarī) due to intense spiritual feeling and the awareness of the Divine. This is a state of wāridāt. What is meant by wāridāt: is a ‘state’ of spiritual ecstasy, which comes to the heart of a mystic involuntarily 49. Literally, sukr means is intoxication. What is meant by intoxication in mysticism is a special ‘state’ through which a Ṣūfī advances in his spiritual journey. In this ‘state’ he is not in his senses but is completely drunk in love of God. Therefore his acts and sayings cannot be understood merely by intellect and reason, and even may seem sometimes blasphemous for he is totally intoxicated50. From the point of view of mystics, the state of sukr or intoxication comes at the moment, when a mystic sees the light of God through the eyes of his heart. This dissolves his identity. Thus, this intoxication is result of love, and love is the result of his feeling, and his feeling is the result of Grace of God. Therefore a mystic does not inter in this ‘state’ on his own will, rather it is by the Grace of God52. The literal meaning of ṣaḥw is alertness. Terminologically, it is indicative of returning to senses from the ‘state’ of ecstasy and intoxication.. Ṣaḥw can be known only as the opposite of the state of sukr53. If the ‘state’ of intoxication of the mystic comes, as the result of Divine Grace, then the state of alertness or return to his senses is also due to Grace of God. The state of ‘alertness’ is not like the ‘state’ of intoxication. It is also not like ‘state’ prior to which he entered in the state of Sukr. But it is a higher ‘state’ and has all that, which is indicative of perfection of the ‘state’ of intoxication. The mystic having all the ‘positive effects’ of the ‘state’ of intoxication, return to the his senses54. The distinguished examples of the school of sukr is Bāyazīd Bustāmī, Ḥallāj and Abū Sa’īd Abul Khair. The distinguished representative of the School of ṣaḥw is Junaid Bagdādī. Most of the Ṣūfīs follow the method of ṣaḥw. Bāyazīd Bustāmī considers ṣaḥw as an attributes of man and a veil between and ‘sight’ of God. He considers sukr (ecstasy) as the ‘state’ which purifies man from his human imperfection; dissolves his will and makes the Will of God rule his whole being55. On the other hand Junaid Baghdādī considers sukr as one of dangers, and believes that sukr is such a dangerous ‘state’ that if the mystic leaved the consideration of health and moderation; he will be destroyed and his insight will not benefit him at all56. Shatḥ (ÔØÍ) (blasphemous utterances) is one of the characteristics of the School of sukr. In this state the mystic utters astonishing words, which take one nearer to kufr. This is called shatḥ. Such sayings by some of the mystics like Bāyazīd, Ḥallāj and Abū Sa’īd Abul Khair were mainly the cause that many fuqahā (the clergymen and experts of shrīah) considering Sufis as Kāfir (heretics). They gave many fatwās (edicts) in excommunication (takfīr) of Ṣūfīs. However, those, who believe in the ṣaḥw, try to interpret these shatḥīyāt of the intoxicated mystics in symbolic way in order to make them accord with religion and Sharīah. Side by side with above mentioned trends, one of the other characteristic of the third phase was marked by a group of Ṣūfīs to harmonize Ṭaṣawwuf with the views and teachings of Islām, in their quest and to help prove that they correspond to the Islamic teachings. Junaid Baghdādī tried very hard to explain shaṭḥīyat of Bāyazīd Busṭāmī; and, it is said, he wrote a book on this subject57. Abū Naṣr Sarrāj (b. 378 A.H.) says in the definition of shaṭḥ: at the time, when the mystic is in a state of ecstasy and is unable to bear the Divine Reality which is revealed to his heart, he utters words and sentences which seem very complex and bewildering, and the audience cannot understand it. Terminologically, these are called shaṭḥ58. Junaid Baghdādī, was one of the leading figures of the School of ṣaḥw. ‘Aṭṭār calls him Sayyyid al-Ṭāifa (leader of the group) and Lisān ul Qoum (spokesman of the group). Ṣūfī masters of Baghdād followed this School during his life and in the later period also59. Khwāja ‘Abdullāh Anṣārī says about Junaid: “when junaid appeared, he systematize this knowledge and expanded it and wrote books in this science”60. Junaid was among the moderate Ṣufīs. He tried to harmonize Taṣawwuf which Sharīah in all respects. He made inner meditation, purification of heart and having good moral virtues as the foundation of his Ṣūfī way61. Here, we should also mention Ḥallāj also, who was the other pole of Junaid. Ḥusain Ibn Manṣūr Ḥallāj was one of the most controversial Islamic mystics. He is famous for his intoxicated utterances (shaṭḥīyāt)62. For this reason, he was accused of kufr (apostasy). The religious scholars ex-communicated him and considered him Kāfir. During the life of Muqtadir the ‘Abbāsid caliph, he was hanged in the year 306 A.H., or 309 A.H. What has been recorded from him, shows that he believed in waḥdat al wujūd i.e., the unity of man’s being with the Being of God, and the unity of mystic with the Divine Self. Following are some of his intoxicated signs “ḥaq, ḥaq, ḥaq! I am the ḥaq (the Truth i.e. God),” and “I am who destroyed the nation of ‘Ād and Thamūd”65. From fifth century onwards, gradually poetry became prevalent among the mystics, and the mystical terms entered into the corpus of poetry. Likewise, it was in this period that the monasteries (khānqāh) building was expanded and these increased in numbers. Abu Sa’ī Abul Khair (b. 440 A.H) is the most famous mystic of the fifth century A.H. He was among those, who followed the method of sukr and he is famous for his intoxicated sayings. It is narrated from him that while speaking, he said: “There is none in my coat, except Allah” and then signed at his coat and his dress66. Prominent among his utterances about waḥdat al wujūd is this one: “there is nothing here, except Allah”67 Abū Ḥāmid Muḥammad Ghazzālī (b. 505 A.H) is also counted among the famous mystics of the fifth century A.H. He was also from among the group of ṣaḥw. In his famous work, Iḥyā ul ‘Ulūm, he made the greatest attempt to harmonize Sharī’at and Ṭarīqat #7778;ūfī way). Thus, he played a leading role in making Ṭarīqat acceptable to religious people. He laid greatest emphasis on concentration of the heart in acts of worship and on following the precepts of Sharī’at. In this way, he brought ‘Irfān and ethics in the domain of Sharī’at. In the sixth century Taṣawwuf became very popular and most of the kings and chiefs supported the Ṣūfīs. However, there also arose opposition to Taṣawwuf in this century. For instance, Abul Faraj Ibn Jauzī (b. 597 A.H), who is among the leading theologian of the sixth century A.H., assaulted the Taṣawwuf and made an endeavor to refute it in his book, Talbīs Iblīs (ÊáÈیÓ ÇÈáیÓ). The Fourth Period: this period starts from the seventh century A.H. During this period, distinguished mystics appeared. These included Najmuddīn Kubrā (b. 616 A.H), Farīduddīn ‘Aṭṭār (b. between 626 to 628 A.H), the author of the book Tazkiratul ul Auliyā, Suharwardī (b. 632 A.H), author of the book ‘Awārif al-Ma’ārif. Ṣūfī personalities of this period including Ṣadruddīn Muḥammad Qūnawī (b. 672 A.H). one of the greatest interpreter of the ideas of Ibn ‘Arabī There also appeared, poets of the standard of Ḥāfiz, Ibn Fāriḍ Miṣrī (b. 632 A.H), and Maulānā Jalāluddīn Rūmī. However, the main personality of this age is Muḥyuddīn Ibn ‘Arabī (b. 638 A.H), the greatest Muslim theosophist. It is due to him that mysticism entered a new stage. Ibn ‘Arabī expanded and explained the beliefs of the mystics, which were in a scattered till that date. He described the mystical ideas in a philosophical and rational way, turning them into philosophical discourse. Later mystics usually borrowed from him. In fact, they did nothing, except dwelling upon Ibn ‘Arabī’s ideas. What is known as the theoretical ‘Irfān in the Islamic culture today, is in fact, represents the views of Ibn ‘Arabī. Ibn ‘Arabī was born in the year 560 A.H. at Marsiya, in South Spain. He died in the year 638 A.H. in Damascus, Syria. In Islamic world, he is known as Shaikh-e Akbar (the grand master) and as Muḥyuddīn (who brought religion to life). His works consists of more than two hundred books and epistles. His magnum opus is his book Futūhāt-e Makkīya. In fact, It is an encyclopedia of ‘Irfān. His other book, Fuṣūṣ ul Ḥikam, is counted among the most important teaching texts in the field of mysticism. The views of Ibn ‘Arabī were propagated most of all by Ṣadruddīn Qūnawī, who was among the nearest friends of Rūmī. He is considered the link between Ibn ‘Arabī and Rūmī. Some scholars consider Mathnavī of Rūmī as the Futūhāt of Persian language. Ṣadruddīn was teacher of Quṭubuddīn Sarrāj, who was the interpreter of the book Ḥikmat al Ishrāq. He entered into correspondence with Khwāja Naṣīruddīn Ṭūsī on the fundamental issues of Philosophy. Sayed Ḥaider Āmulī, Ibn Abī Jamhūr His and Ibn Taraka are the three other important personalities, who propagated Theosophy of Ibn ‘Arabī in the Shī’a world. They had great impact on the later philosophers including Mullā Ṣadrā. The Fifth Period: This last period started after the 9th century A.H. It is during this period that distinction was made between ‘Irfān and Taṣawwuf. Up to this time, different Schools of Ṣūfīs were led by the distinguished intellectuals and academic personalities, who produced many valuable works. However, from this time Taṣsawwuf become a professional way of monasteries (khānqāhs). The Ṣūfī personalities were no more distinguished in theosophy and theoretical mysticism... However, a distinguishing characteristic of this period is that there were some ṣūfī masters who followed the path of mysticism in accordance with sharī’ah. They were practical Ṣūfī masters but did not follow the ways of Ṣūfīs but lived s ordinary Muslims or as ‘ulamā. They abstained from extreme positions. They did not pay any attention to formal rites and etiquettes of Ṣūfīs. They even criticized them. Including among these where some masters of fiqh also, who followed all the rules of sharī’ah. This trend has a long history. Here we can not deal in detail.68. |